About

Accessibility auditing built
for the people who do the work.

Developed by accessibility specialists who found that existing tools solved only part of the problem — scanning without evidence management, findings without workflow, reports without credibility.

The problem we're solving

Accessibility compliance is harder than it should be.

Most accessibility tools scan for violations. Very few help you manage what happens after — triaging findings, building an evidence record, coordinating remediation across teams, satisfying legal and procurement reviewers, and producing reports that decision-makers will actually read.

The audit workspace was built to close that gap. Not a scanner with a report attached, but a complete program management platform designed around the full compliance workflow.

Before

Scanner outputs a raw finding list
Auditor manually maps each to WCAG
Screenshots gathered by hand
Status tracked in a spreadsheet
Report written from scratch each time
Work items created manually per integration

After

Automated scan with WCAG mapping included
Desktop and mobile screenshots captured
Finding status managed in the workspace
Work items pushed to your tracker automatically
AI chat for investigation and guidance
Executive report generated from live data

Design principles

How we think about building this product.

Design for credibility first.

Every screen should feel fit for regulated audit work — stable layouts, precise language, and visual choices that reinforce trust rather than undermine it.

Make dense information easy to scan.

Auditors process large datasets quickly. Strong hierarchy, consistent spacing, and clear severity and compliance cues are essential, not decorative.

Preserve accessibility as a product value.

Strong contrast, keyboard clarity, reduced-motion respect, and resilient labeling are defaults — not features. A product for accessibility auditors must be accessible.

Use premium restraint.

Polished and intentional, without flashy color, unnecessary decoration, or novelty patterns. The aesthetic should never get in the way of the work.

Treat reports as executive artifacts.

Reporting views should read as professional deliverables suitable for leadership reviews, compliance submissions, and external sharing — not screen captures of a dashboard.